Gå till innehåll

Visa maskinöversatt text Obs: Innehåll kan ha översatts automatiskt och inte vara 100% korrekt.

If there were a global emergency fund for garment workers who lose jobs due to climate disasters, who should pay into it and why?

Officiell debatt

Use this space to discuss this question.

Filter results for: Content

Kommentarsdetaljer

Du visar en enda kommentar

Visa alla kommentarer

Kommentarer är inaktiverade, endast administratörer kan svara eller skriva nya.

Bego Demir

14/05/2025 16:00

1 - Brands should pay into the fund, because they are the part taking the most benefit from garment sector, and they are the principal employers.
2 - Garment factories should pay into the fund for any disaster, because they are the first responsible for workers.

Referens: CCC-DEBA-2025-05-77
Versionsnummer 3 (av 3) visa andra versioner

Nödvändiga

Preferenser

Analys och statistik

Marknadsföring

If there were a global emergency fund for garment workers who lose jobs due to climate disasters, who should pay into it and why?

Logga in

Inställningar för cookies

Nödvändiga

Preferenser

Analys och statistik

Marknadsföring

Close

If there were a global emergency fund for garment workers who lose jobs due to climate disasters, who should pay into it and why?

Dela

QR Code

If there were a global emergency fund for garment workers who lose jobs due to climate disasters, who should pay into it and why?

Bekräfta

Logga in