ヘルプ
A participatory process is a sequence of participatory activities (e.g. first filling out a survey, then making proposals, discussing them in face-to-face or virtual meetings, and finally prioritizing them) with the aim of defining and making a decision on a specific topic.
Examples of participatory processes are: a process of electing committee members (where candidatures are first presented, then debated and finally a candidacy is chosen), participatory budgets (where proposals are made, valued economically and voted on with the money available), a strategic planning process, the collaborative drafting of a regulation or norm, the design of an urban space or the production of a public policy plan.
5 - Hold companies accountable
Click on discussion and ideas to theme 5
このプロセスについて
Make companies accountable for the exploitation of workers and the environment
Brands operate without fear of regulation. They hide behind opaque supply chains and push risks onto suppliers while claiming a disproportionate share of the profits. Suppliers in turn push these risks onto workers and the environment. Meanwhile, workers have few avenues for redress. Transparent value chains, effective and accessible grievance mechanisms and responsible purchasing practices are part of keeping corporations accountable.
Yet, companies cannot be relied upon to change the way they operate voluntarily. Mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence, which centres the involvement of workers and access to remedy is an opportunity to prevent and redress harm done to workers and their communities, both by the climate crisis and by the transition to a low-carbon industry that protects and restores nature. Another opportunity are worker-driven legally binding and internationally enforceable agreements negotiated between unions and brands like the International Accord for Health and Safety in the Garment and Textile Industry. These agreements include a key role for trade unions and are enforceable in a court of law.
あなたにとって企業の説明責任とは?
この質問について話し合うために、このスペースを使用してください。デューデリジェンス法
私は、購買慣行を通じてブランドとサプライヤーの間の力の非対称性がどのように維持されるかを明確に取り組むことで、このセクションをより強力にできないかと考えていました。具体的には、デューデリジェンス法は、説明責任が「透明性」にとどまらず、実際にリスクと責任をサプライチェーンの下流に再配分することをどのように保証できるのでしょうか?また、デューデリジェンス法がこの分野に何をもたらすのかをもっと説明したいのではないでしょうか?もしファッションブランドやメーカーを労働者の権利侵害で裁判にかけることができるとしたら、あなたは彼らに何の罪を問うのでしょうか?
企業は、労働者に対する責任を取らないように自分自身を守ろうとします。もし機会があったら、これらの巨大企業に何を請求するでしょうか?最もインパクトのあるものは何でしょうか?関連する参加型プロセス
リファレンス: CCC-PART-2025-04-11