Help
A participatory process is a sequence of participatory activities (e.g. first filling out a survey, then making proposals, discussing them in face-to-face or virtual meetings, and finally prioritizing them) with the aim of defining and making a decision on a specific topic.
Examples of participatory processes are: a process of electing committee members (where candidatures are first presented, then debated and finally a candidacy is chosen), participatory budgets (where proposals are made, valued economically and voted on with the money available), a strategic planning process, the collaborative drafting of a regulation or norm, the design of an urban space or the production of a public policy plan.
5 - Hold companies accountable
Click on discussion and ideas to theme 5
About this process
Make companies accountable for the exploitation of workers and the environment
Brands operate without fear of regulation. They hide behind opaque supply chains and push risks onto suppliers while claiming a disproportionate share of the profits. Suppliers in turn push these risks onto workers and the environment. Meanwhile, workers have few avenues for redress. Transparent value chains, effective and accessible grievance mechanisms and responsible purchasing practices are part of keeping corporations accountable.
Yet, companies cannot be relied upon to change the way they operate voluntarily. Mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence, which centres the involvement of workers and access to remedy is an opportunity to prevent and redress harm done to workers and their communities, both by the climate crisis and by the transition to a low-carbon industry that protects and restores nature. Another opportunity are worker-driven legally binding and internationally enforceable agreements negotiated between unions and brands like the International Accord for Health and Safety in the Garment and Textile Industry. These agreements include a key role for trade unions and are enforceable in a court of law.
기업의 책임은 당신에게 어떤 의미입니까?
이 공간을 사용하여 이 질문에 대해 토론하십시오.실사법
구매 관행을 통해 브랜드와 공급업체 간의 권력 비대칭이 어떻게 유지되는지 명시적으로 다루어 이 섹션을 더 강력하게 만들 수 있는지 생각하고 있었습니다. 구체적으로, 실사법은 어떻게 책임이 "투명성"에 그치지 않고 실제로 공급망 아래로 위험과 책임을 재분배하도록 보장할 수 있습니까? 또한 실사법이 이 분야에서 무엇을 가져오는지 더 자세히 설명하고 싶을까요?만약 당신이 패션 브랜드나 제조업자를 노동자 권리 침해로 법정에 세울 수 있다면, 당신은 그들을 어떤 혐의로 기소할 건가요?
기업은 근로자에 대한 책임을 지지 않으려고 합니다. 기회가 주어진다면, 이 거대 기업들에게 어떤 혐의를 씌우시겠습니까? 가장 영향력 있는 것은 무엇입니까?Related processes
Reference: CCC-PART-2025-04-11