Skip to main content

Cookie settings

We use cookies to ensure the basic functionalities of the website and to enhance your online experience. You can configure and accept the use of the cookies, and modify your consent options, at any time.

Essential

Preferences

Analytics and statistics

Marketing

Show original text Warning: Content might be automatically translated and not be 100% accurate.

Close debate

What is the summary or conclusion of this debate?

What would make brands pay into to a social security fund for workers who lose their job or pay because of climate issues?

Avatar: Starting question Starting question

As the exploitation of workers and the environment leads to extreme responses that destroys livelihoods, who should pay when consequences affect workers? Should brands be forced to take action? Or should workers self-organise?

Share your thoughts and ideas

Comment

Confirm

Please log in

The password is too short.

Share