ヘルプ
参加型プロセスとは、特定のトピックを定義し、決定することを目的とした一連の参加型活動(例:最初に調査に記入し、次に提案を行い、対面または仮想会議でそれらについて話し合い、最後に優先順位を付ける)です。
参加型プロセスの例としては、委員会メンバーを選出するプロセス(最初に候補者が提示され、次に討論され、最後に候補者が選ばれる)、参加型予算(提案が行われ、経済的に評価され、利用可能なお金で投票される)、戦略的計画プロセス、規制または規範の共同起草、都市空間の設計、または公共政策計画の作成があります。
3-グリーンでソーシャルウォッシング
このスペースを使用して、テーマ3について話し合います
このプロセスについて
グリーンで公正なファッションにイエス、搾取をかくまうグリーンウォッシュの工場にはノー。
Should government check the claims fashion brands and manufacturers make about workers’ rights and the environment? If so, how?
Fashion brands love to sell themselves as 'green' and 'ethical'. But are they really? Should government sanction them when their claims are inflated?
We should slow down and/or redirect fashion marketing
Ban manipulative marketing fostering impulsive buys. Restrict fast Fashion marketing. Support communication and awareness raising on repair, long use, value...
What innovative instruments (legal or other) can you imagine to strengthen workers' and consumers' ability to challenge false claims about workers’ rights or the environment?
Use the space to discuss this question.
Should government check the sustainability claims fashion brands make? And how?
Fashion brands love to sell themselves as 'green'. But are they really? Should government sanction them when their claims are inflated?
What can be done to make sure that the new wave of repair, reuse and recycling (circular economy) initiatives truly address workers’ rights and the environmental harm?
Use this space to discuss this question.
How do you challenge brands and manufacturers that make environmental claims but keep exploiting their workers?
Brands often make bold claims about their environmental impact, but they fail to disclose how poorly they pay workers or treat the environment. How do you challenge their claims? Do you research the brand's history and question their bold claims?
共有