跳到主內容

Cookie 設定

我們使用cookie來確保網站的基本功能並提升您的在線體驗。您可以隨時配置和接受cookie的使用,並修改您的同意選項。

基本功能

偏好設定

分析和統計

市場行銷

顯示原始文本 警告:內容可能會被自動翻譯,並且可能不是100%準確。

幫助

參與式過程是一系列參與性活動(例如,首先填寫調查表,然後提出建議,在面對面或虛擬會議中討論,最後確定它們的優先順序),目的是定義特定主題並做出決定。

參與式過程的示例包括:選舉委員會成員的過程(首先提出候選人,然後進行辯論,最後選擇候選人)、參與式預算(提出提案、進行經濟評估並使用可用資金進行投票)、戰略規劃過程、合作起草法規或規範、城市空間設計或制定公共政策計劃。

3 - 綠色和社會洗滌

利用此空間討論主題 3

關於此流程

對綠色和時尚說“是”;對窩藏剝削的漂綠工廠說不。

💬 Discussions & Ideas

6
See all debates

Should government check the claims fashion brands and manufacturers make about workers’ rights and the environment? If so, how?

Fashion brands love to sell themselves as 'green' and 'ethical'. But are they really? Should government sanction them when their claims are inflated?

We should slow down and/or redirect fashion marketing

Ban manipulative marketing fostering impulsive buys. Restrict fast Fashion marketing. Support communication and awareness raising on repair, long use, value...

What innovative instruments (legal or other) can you imagine to strengthen workers' and consumers' ability to challenge false claims about workers’ rights or the environment?

Use the space to discuss this question.

Should government check the sustainability claims fashion brands make? And how?

Fashion brands love to sell themselves as 'green'. But are they really? Should government sanction them when their claims are inflated?

What can be done to make sure that the new wave of repair, reuse and recycling (circular economy) initiatives truly address workers’ rights and the environmental harm?

Use this space to discuss this question.

How do you challenge brands and manufacturers that make environmental claims but keep exploiting their workers?

Brands often make bold claims about their environmental impact, but they fail to disclose how poorly they pay workers or treat the environment. How do you challenge their claims? Do you research the brand's history and question their bold claims?

相關程序

8
參考資料: CC-PART-2025-04-4

確認

Please log in

密碼太短。

分享