ヘルプ
参加型プロセスとは、特定のトピックを定義し、決定することを目的とした一連の参加型活動(例:最初に調査に記入し、次に提案を行い、対面または仮想会議でそれらについて話し合い、最後に優先順位を付ける)です。
参加型プロセスの例としては、委員会メンバーを選出するプロセス(最初に候補者が提示され、次に討論され、最後に候補者が選ばれる)、参加型予算(提案が行われ、経済的に評価され、利用可能なお金で投票される)、戦略的計画プロセス、規制または規範の共同起草、都市空間の設計、または公共政策計画の作成があります。
6 - セーフティネット
このスペースを使用して、テーマ6について話し合います
このプロセスについて
移行費用を労働者に支払わせない
If companies can afford to pay millions to shareholders, owners and management, why can’t they guarantee workers basic protection as climate change hits?
Use this space to discuss this question.
Do you know anyone that lost a job or pay because a farm or factory in fashion closed because of flooding or heat? What happened?
Use this space to discuss this question.
How can governments do better at dealing with climate change and workers' rights?
Use this space to discuss this question.
If there were a global emergency fund for garment workers who lose jobs due to climate disasters, who should pay into it and why?
Use this space to discuss this question.
Can up- and reskilling contribute to more resilience and independence of workers in the supply chain? Who should be organizing, designing and paying for up- and reskilling initiatives?
This is based on a participants' comment to the prompt text during the German Clean Clothes Campaign meeting in Leipzig in 2025. I rephrased it into a question/discussion topic.
What would make brands pay into to a social security fund for workers who lose their job or pay because of climate issues?
As the exploitation of workers and the environment leads to extreme responses that destroys livelihoods, who should pay when consequences affect workers? Should brands be forced to take action? Or should workers self-organise?
